Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc v. USDC-HIIn re: Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc v. USDC-HI
as 23-70023
Not Classified By Court: In re: CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC., RODNEY A. MAILE, in an Official Capacity as Administrative Director of the Courts, ELIZABETH M. ZACK, in an Official Capacity as Chief Clerk of the Hawaii Supreme Court and others
Petitioner: CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Civil Beat Law Center for the Public Interest, Inc v. Rodney Maile, et al
as 23-15108
Plaintiff / Appellant: CIVIL BEAT LAW CENTER FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: RODNEY A. MAILE, in an Official Capacity as Administrative Director of the Courts, ELIZABETH M. ZACK, in an Official Capacity as Chief Clerk of the Hawai`i Supreme Court, LORI ANN OKITA, in an Official Capacity as Chief Court Administrator of the First Circuit and others
Allen Garrett v. USA, et al
as 23-1043
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (Third Circuit Court of Appeals) and DAVID J. PORTER, (Third Circuit Court of Appeals)
Marc Stephens, et al v. William Martini, et al
as 22-3384
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARC A. STEPHENS and TYRONE K. STEPHENS
Defendant: JUDGE WILLIAM J. MARTINI, of the District Court in Newark, JUDGE ANTHONY J. SCIRICA, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, JUDGE L. FELIPE RESTREPO, of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit and others
Defendant / Appellee: GURBIR S. GREWAL, Attorney General, States of New Jersey, Individually and in official capacity
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raquinio v. Third Circuit Court Kona Division, et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00499
Plaintiff: Noe Raquinio
Defendant: Third Circuit Court Kona Division, Waimea District Court, Aaron Messer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
GARRETT v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2022cv05734
Plaintiff: ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT and THIRD CIRCUIT DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARRETT v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv05734
Plaintiff: ALLEN DUPREE GARRETT
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PATRICIA S. DODSZUWEIT and THIRD CIRCUIT DISTRICT COURT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jamal Parker v. Antony Blinken, et al
as 22-16331
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER, Moor beneficiary, in personam, a Emperor, Admiral Marine, Merchant Piloter, AKA Jamal El Trust, DBA Jamal Darius Parker
Defendant / Appellee: ANTONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, United States Department of State, Heirs and Assignees, DEBRA ANNE HAALAND, Secretary of the Interior, Department of the Interior, Heirs and Assignees, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Heirs and Assignees and others
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2022cv03532
Plaintiff: THOMAS ROBERTSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, U.S. POSTAL INSPECTOR, AL HERZOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?