Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Harris v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03290
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Harris
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande, Monica Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRIS v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00803
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTHONY HARRIS
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and ROY COOPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023ct03245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Williams v. Ishee et al
as 1:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
Andre David Williams
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Ben Carver and Keven R. Chung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nolon v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023ct03227
Plaintiff:
Ardie D. Nolon and Ardie Defronso Nolon
Defendant:
Todd E. Ishee, Roderick K. Watson and Timothy P. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tudor v. Ishee
as 3:2023cv00435
Petitioner:
Travis Tudor
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AMERSON v. ISHEE et al
as 1:2023cv00579
Petitioner:
PIERRE ALEXANDER AMERSON
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE and TIMOTHY D. MOOSE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oxendine v. Moose et al
as 5:2023ct03196
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Oxendine
Defendant:
Timothy D. Moose, Todd E. Ishee, Kimberly D. Grande and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Letterlough v. Cothron et al
as 5:2023ct03192
Plaintiff:
Derrick Derrail Letterlough and Derrick Letterlough
Defendant:
David E. Cothron, Demetrius A. Clark and Todd E. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
