Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
COCHRAN v. TATE
as 3:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
ERIC COCHRAN, SCOTT M. DAVIS, SR., CODY A. KURTZ and others
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, C/O CRUZ, C/O HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KURTZ v. TATE et al.
as 3:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
CODY A. KURTZ, SCOTT M. DAVIS, ERIC S. COCHRAN and others
Defendant:
WARDEN ABBY TATE, C.O. CRUZ, C.O. HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BELTRAN v. TATE et al
as 3:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
JESUS M. BELTRAN, JR.
Defendant:
CRUZ, HATFIELD, SGT MOPHET and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MOLLIVER v. TATE et al
as 3:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOHN TRAVIS MOLLIVER
Defendant:
ABBIE TATTE, ZACHARY STITT, NATE PORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
READER v. BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 3:2022cv00140
Plaintiff:
RICHARD READER
Defendant:
BLAIR COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, ABBIE TATE, JAMES ECKARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
LOVE v. THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2022cv03215
Plaintiff:
ABBY LOVE
Defendant:
THE LINCOLN NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
WILLIAMS v. TATE
as 3:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
TERELL A. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
ABBIE TATE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
JACKSON et al v. NICHOLS et al
as 2:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
DUANE JACKSON and ELIZABETH JACKSON
Defendant:
ABBY L. NICHOLS, CYNTHIA J. RODICH and MICHAEL RODICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
