Cases 11 - 20 of 21,650
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Murray v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03758
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, Dept. Hamuton, C.O. Philogene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ABURADWAN v. RAMIREZ et al
as 2:2024cv06007
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD ABURADWAN
Defendant:
GREGORY E. RAMIREZ, THE CITY OF NEW YORK and THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF SANITATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Walker v. The City of New York
as 24-1273
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WALKER and Awol
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03557
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Casas v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv03431
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Casas
Defendant:
United States of America, DEA Officers John Does 1-5, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tocker-Rose v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03447
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tocker-Rose
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diomande v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv03509
Plaintiff:
Kassia Diomande
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York Police Officer, John Doe, Unknown Tax ID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 IDEA: Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (short title)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
