Cases 11 - 20 of 173
Brown v. Clinton, Township of et al
as 2:2023cv12440
Plaintiff:
Quinton Brown
Defendant:
Clinton, Township of, James Gilchrist, Richard Mangan and others
Wolshlager v. Mettler et al
as 1:2023cv00916
Plaintiff:
Doug Wolshlager
Defendant:
Clinton Mettler, Peter Dent, Ben Ebarly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Williams v. Muskegon County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
Tyrong Jon Williams
Defendant:
Muskegon County Jail and Clinton Rosekopf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Auk et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 4:2023cv10897
Plaintiff:
Bryan Auk and Anthony Auk
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Alonzo Jones, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Corbeil v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
Clinton Matthew Corbeil
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Reiff v. Setty et al
as 2:2023cv10513
Plaintiff:
Daniel Reiff
Defendant:
Broc Setty and Clinton, Township of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Young v. St. Clair Shores Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv11968
Plaintiff:
Larry Young
Defendant:
St. Clair Shores Police Department and Clinton Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Worrell v. Thang, Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv11009
Plaintiff:
George Worrell, Jr.
Defendant:
Thang, Inc., George Clinton, Sony Music Entertainment and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hill v. Ionia, County of et al
as 1:2022cv00320
Plaintiff:
Gregory Hill
Defendant:
County of Ionia, Jack Shattuck, Jon Hess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
