Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Garcia v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., et al
as 2:2019cv00268
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., WEC 200B-CSF-7 LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Esmerelda Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SECURA INSURANCE, A MUTUAL COMPANY v. WILLIAMS BROS. HEALTH CARE PHARMACY, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
SECURA INSURANCE
Defendant:
JOHN COLEMAN and WILLIAMS BROS. HEALTH CARE PHARMACY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tanner et al v. Hometown Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2017cv00697
Plaintiff:
Gary Tanner and Shelley Tanner
Defendant:
Hometown Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Elliott v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00103
Plaintiff:
Terry Elliott
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. , Hook-SupeRx, L.L.C. and CVS Indiana, L.L.C.
Mediator:
John Whiteleather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cundiff v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Amani S Cundiff
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LUKE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 4:2016cv00117
Defendant:
CAMILLE BOYKEN, RACHEL BUSCH, COUNTY OF DEARBORN and others
Plaintiff:
BILLY GENE LUKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ECONO-MED PHARMACY, INC. v. ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv00789
Plaintiff:
ECONO-MED PHARMACY, INC.
Defendant:
ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
YHOM, LLC v. TIWARI et al
as 1:2015cv01458
Defendant:
ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS, INC., CALLNET CALL CENTER, COHEN & MALAD, LLP and others
Plaintiff:
YHOM, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
MIMMS ET AL. v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.
as 1:2015cv00970
Defendant:
CVS PHARMACY, INC.
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MIMMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
