Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Neal Caplinger v. CCA, et al
as 14-35190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEAL WAYNE CAPLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, TIMOTHY WENGLER, THOMAS KESSLER and others
Loftis v. Ellis et al
as 1:2014cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kirk Loftis
Defendant:
Jason Ellis, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worthington v. Wengler et al
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Scott Arthur Worthington
Defendant:
Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler, Alec Thacker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benson v. City of Texas City, Texas et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
Michael Benson
Defendant:
City of Texas City, Texas, Mayor Matthew Doyle, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Caplinger v. CCA et al
as 1:2012cv00537
Plaintiff:
Neal Wayne Caplinger
Defendant:
CCA, Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Loftis v. Wengler et al
as 1:2012cv00359
Plaintiff:
Kirk A Loftis
Defendant:
Tim Wengler, Thomas Kessler, Joseph Cardona and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delphi Corporation Securities, Derivative and "Erisa" Litigation
as 2:2005md01725
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Hanners, Carolyn Hanners, Vanessa Jones and others
Defendant:
Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P., Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P., Deloitte and Touche, L. L. P. and others
Objector:
Pamela Geller
Special Master:
Lyan Phillips
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Albrecht, Anne, et al v. Com Empl Benefits, et al
as 02-5325
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anne K. Albrecht, Lillian R. Alston, James August and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Committee on Employee Benefits of the Federal Reserve Employee Benefits System, Edward W. Kelley, In his capacity as Chairman of the Committee on Employee Benefits, Roger W. Ferguson, Jr., In his capacity as member of the Committee on Employee Benefits and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
