Cases 11 - 20 of 16,928
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Sena v. Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Alexis Sena
Defendant:
Torres, Villafane, Aloi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUARDADO TORRES v. GABBY
as 5:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
ENDIRA YANEE GUARDADO TORRES
Respondent:
GABBY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Vazquez v. 142 Knickerbocker Enterprises, Corp.
as 24-1481
Plaintiff:
SANTIAGO ALONSO VAZQUEZ, SALVADOR SANTIAGO BACILIO, TELESFORO TORRES and others
Defendant:
MOSHE AZOULAY, 142 KNICKERBOCKER ENTERPRISE, CORP., GEORGE AUTO SPA, CORP. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
(PC) Buckhanan v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01523
Plaintiff:
Xavier Buckhanan
Defendant:
United States of America, Torres, Vargas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Luis Torres v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11669
Petitioner:
LUIS RALPHY TORRES
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
