Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Tuttle v. AT&T Mobility et al
as 3:2018cv05179
Plaintiff:
Josiah Tuttle
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, Damir Nodarivic and CWA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv05180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2017cv01106
Plaintiff:
Stephan Tuttle
Defendant:
Central Kitsap School District
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv05567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Thomes v. Tuttle, et al.
as 2:2016cv00051
Plaintiff:
Phillip Eugene Thomes
Defendant:
Justine Tuttle, Jeremy Wilson, Christine Obleness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Block v. Washington State Bar Association et al
as 2:2015cv02018
Plaintiff:
Anne K Block
Defendant:
Washington State Bar Association , Linda Eide, Mark Plivilech and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Tuttle v. Whole Foods Market Pacific Northwest, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
Roxanne M Tuttle
Defendant:
Whole Foods Market Pacific Northwest Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tuttle v. Colvin (previously Astrue)
as 2:2012cv03035
Plaintiff:
Michael Tuttle
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tuttle v. Bank of New York Mellon et al
as 2:2011cv01048
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Tuttle
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon , Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. and Vericrest Financial Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Tift v. Painters & Allied Trades District Council No 5 of the International Union Painters and Allied Trades AFL-CIO-CLC et al
as 2:2008cv00290
Plaintiff:
Gregory S Tift
Defendant:
Painters & Allied Trades District Council No 5 of the International Union Painters and Allied Trades AFL-CIO-CLC, Carpet Linoleum & Soft Tile Layers Local Union 1238 IUPAT, David C Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
