Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
STEELE v. U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF N.C.
as 1:2016cv01193
Petitioner: ANTONIO SHERROD STEELE
Respondent: U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wedington v. U.S. Federal Government et al
as 5:2014ct03319
Plaintiff: Calvin S. Wedington
Defendant: U.S. Federal Government, Art Beeler, Unknown Deputy U.S. Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rankins v. U.S. Marshals Service
as 5:2014ct03174
Plaintiff: Michael Rankins
Defendant: U.S. Marshals Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMITH v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00038
Plaintiff: KEVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, CITY OF CONCORD, NC , CABARRUS COUNTY and others
Movant: NC DEPT. SECRETARY OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985
WOODS et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2009mc00048
Petitioner: Isaac Woods, Regina Woods and Ella R. Woods
Respondent: United States of America, U.s. marshal service, Rogers reality and auction co. inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 3001 Federal Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes None
WOODS et al
as 1:2009cv00538
Plaintiff: ISAAC WOODS, REGINA WOODS and ELLA R. WOODS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, ROGERS REALITY AND AUCTION CO. INC. and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Type: Civil Rights None
Tucker v. United States Attorney et al
as 5:2008hc02025
Petitioner: Cornelius Tucker, Jr.
Respondent: United States Attorney, Felice Corpening, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
ROBINSON v. CALHOUN et al
as 1:2007cv00077
Plaintiff: RESTONEY ROBINSON
Defendant: PAUL B. CALHOUN, HOWARD L. WOOTERS, COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?