Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, U.S. Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, New Hope Housing and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betancourt et al v. Morales et al
as 1:2019cv00006
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Michael Morales and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Maria Acacia Morin and Abel Betancourt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Romans v. U.S. Dpt. Justice et al
as 4:2018cv04634
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service and U.S. Dpt. Justice
Plaintiff:
Derek Romans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. U. S. Postal Service
as 4:2018cv03715
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE and U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Margarita Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Ottens v. U.S. Postal Service
as 5:2018cv00455
Plaintiff:
Gina Ottens
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Manansala v. U.S. Postal Service
as 4:2018cv00294
Plaintiff:
Arsenio Manansala
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. U.S. Department of Agriculture et al
as 7:2016cv00144
Plaintiff:
Stuart Russell
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Vantage Point Home Owner Association, Market Street Food and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordova v. Molana et al
as 2:2016cv00203
Plaintiff:
Christina Cordova
Defendant:
David Molana and U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2009cv00359
Plaintiff:
Carla E. Perkins
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, John E. Potter, Sheila Smith Speans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
