Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 11 - 20 of 2,220
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff: Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant: US Marshals, USA and PCRDF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martin v. USA
as 4:2024cv00286
Petitioner: Brandon Charles Martin
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Al-Barr v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00063
Plaintiff: Lord Judah Al-Barr
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Easterling v. Nestle USA Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00052
Plaintiff: Brian Easterling
Defendant: Nestle USA Inc, Vitality Foodservice Inc, Nestle Prepared Foods Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Kelly v. USA
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff: Larry W Kelly, Jr
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Paul v. USA
as 2:2024cv02039
Petitioner: Jeffery William Paul
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul v. USA
as 6:2024cv06041
Petitioner: Jeffery William Paul
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harkenreader v. USA
as 4:2024cv00232
Petitioner: Alex Harkenreader
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Smith v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00229
Plaintiff: Derrick Wade Smith
Defendant: USA, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Presley v. USA
as 2:2024cv02031
Petitioner: Brent Presley
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?