Cases 11 - 20 of 6,963
Dixon v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dixon
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Ainscough v. United States of America
as 5:2024hc02104
Petitioner:
Jared Ainscough
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 39,991.998502 USDT Virtual Currency
as 5:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
39,991.998502 USDT Virtual Currency
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981 Civil Forfeiture
Blakney v. United States of America
as 5:2024ct03082
Plaintiff:
Larry Blakney
Defendant:
United States of America, Warden Scarantino, Logan Grady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $71,370.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2024cv00457
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $71,370.00 IN U.S.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY $40,500.00 IN U.S.
as 1:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CURRENCY $40,500.00 IN U.S.
Claimant:
INGRID JIMENEZ SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981 Civil Forfeiture - Gambling, etc.
Anderson v. United States of America, et al
as 3:2024cv00516
Defendant:
Carlton Anderson, United States of America and Lisa Marie Groth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Coyne v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
James Coyne
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Persike v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Michelle Renee Persike
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Swarthout v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Matthew Swarthout
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
