Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Barnes v. Shartle et al
as 4:2018cv00491
Defendant:
Unknown Bowers, Unknown Combs, I Ceniceros and others
Plaintiff:
James W Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Weibel v. United States Penitentiary, Tucson et al
as 4:2018cv00463
Defendant:
Unknown Alexander, Unknown Williams, United States Penitentiary, Tucson and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Weibel and Nathaniel John Ross Weibel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Skordahl v. Beltazar et al
as 4:2018cv00379
Defendant:
Unknown Beltazar, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Unknown Ash
Plaintiff:
Jeremie W Skordahl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allah v. Ash et al
as 4:2018cv00259
Plaintiff:
Rateek Allah
Defendant:
Unknown Ash, Unknown Stokes, Unknown Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reger v. Wilhite et al
as 1:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Kelly David Reger
Defendant:
Travis L. Wilhite, Jr., Unknown Corchado and Unknown Ash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salley v. Apker et al
as 4:2018cv00215
Plaintiff:
Daniel Eric Salley
Defendant:
Craig Apker, Theresa M Talplacido, Louis W Winn, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Shartle et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
Errick Eugene Gilmore
Defendant:
Unknown Mishel, Unknown Shied, Unknown Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robert Huddleston v. Wilson Cnty Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 16-6307
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. HUDDLESTON
Defendant - Appellee:
WILSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TENNESSEE CORRECTIONS INSTITUTE, SWANSON SERVICES CORPORATION and others
Godwin v. England et al
as 4:2016cv00465
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
S England, JT Shartle, AW Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Godwin v. England et al
as 4:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Roger Dale Godwin
Defendant:
Unknown England, Unknown Michaels, JT Shartle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
