Cases 11 - 20 of 93
In Re Snap Financial Data Breach Litigation
as 2:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Tracy Tanner, Tameka Montgomery, Sterling Simeon and others
Defendant:
Snap Finance, LLC, Snap RTO, LLC, Snap Finance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Victor Sanchez, et al v. Albertson's LLC
as 22-16299
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTOR SANCHEZ
Appellant:
JORDAN P. SCHNITZER, Counsel for Plaintiff
Defendant / Appellee:
ALBERTSON'S LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Avila v. EYM Diner of Florida, LLC
as 2:2021cv14369
Plaintiff:
Rene Garcia Avila and Victor Sanchez
Defendant:
EYM Diner of Florida, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Sanchez v. Witaker et al
as 1:2021cv00136
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez, Jr
Defendant:
Brandi Witaker and Mathew Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Taylor County Adult Detention Center et al
as 1:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez, Jr.
Defendant:
Taylor County Adult Detention Center, Abilene Police Department and FNU Valentine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez Jr v. Sanchez
as 1:2021cv00125
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez, Jr
Defendant:
Pamela Rae Graham Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanchez v. Gold Standard Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Binny's Beverage Depot
as 1:2021cv03349
Plaintiff:
Victor Sanchez
Defendant:
Gold Standard Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Binny's Beverage Depot
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanchez et al v. Walgreen Company et al
as 2:2020cv01291
Plaintiff:
Teddy Sanchez and Victor Sanchez
Defendant:
Surafel G. Tafesse, Jane Jones, Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
