Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Moller v. Fulton State Hospital Medical Staff
as 2:2020cv04056
Defendant:
Fulton State Hospital Medical Staff
Plaintiff:
Vance Ray Moller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lake v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00205
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Vance V. Lake, Sr.
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
LaFarge v. Doug Bradley Trucking et al
as 4:2019cv00890
Plaintiff:
Dena LaFarge
Defendant:
Doug Bradley Trucking and Joseph P Vance, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clark v. Mell et al
as 4:2019cv00823
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture and Ann L Mell
Plaintiff:
Vance R. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Toucheshawks v. United States of America et al
as 4:2019cv00242
Plaintiff:
Deborah Toucheshawks
Defendant:
United States of America and State of Missouri
Petitioner:
Marguerite Martin, Melissa J. Bazzy, Rhonda T. Favero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shannon v. Berryhill
as 4:2018cv01714
Plaintiff:
Vance Shannon
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clark v. United States of America Rural Housing Service
as 4:2018cv00652
Plaintiff:
Vance Clark
Defendant:
United States of America Rural Housing Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Simpson v. Scott County Jail et al
as 1:2018cv00031
Plaintiff:
John Lee Simpson
Defendant:
Scott County Jail, Wes Drury, Paxton Ayres and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Scott County Detention Center et al
as 1:2017cv00205
Plaintiff:
John M. Bradley
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center, Paxton Ayres, Wes Drury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. City of St. Louis Missouri
as 4:2015cv01433
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Percy Green, III , Abram Pruitt, Jr. , Harrith RT Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
