Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Werteks Closed Joint Stock Company et al v. GNC Corporation et al
as 0:2016cv60688
Plaintiff:
Werteks Closed Joint Stock Company and ThermoLife International LLC
Defendant:
GNC Corporation , General Nutrition Centers, Inc. , General Nutrition Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Werteks Closed Joint Stock Company et al v. Vitacost.Com, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv60695
Plaintiff:
Werteks Closed Joint Stock Company and ThermoLife International LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.Com, Inc. and Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dba VXP
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Guyzar, LLC v. Vitacost.com, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00224
Plaintiff:
Guyzar, LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
AHMED v. VITACOST.COM, INC.
as 1:2015cv00036
Plaintiff:
AASMA AHMED
Defendant:
VITACOST.COM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Holliday v. Albion Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 9:2014cv81294
Plaintiff:
Gregory Holliday
Defendant:
Albion Laboratories, Inc. , Vitacost.Com, Inc. , DrVita, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harcol Research, LLC v. Vitacost.com, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00809
Plaintiff:
Harcol Research, LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
eDekka LLC v. Vitacost.com, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00319
Plaintiff:
eDekka LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Eclipse IP LLC v. Vitacost.com, Inc
as 8:2013cv01636
Plaintiff:
Eclipse IP LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.com, Inc
UbiComm LLC v. Vitacost.com Inc.
as 1:2013cv01028
Plaintiff:
UbiComm LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.com Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Vitacost.com Inc.
Counter_defendant:
UbiComm LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Vitacost.com, Inc.
as 6:2013cv00414
Plaintiff:
Landmark Technology, LLC
Defendant:
Vitacost.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
