Cases 11 - 20 of 34
McCladdie v. Warden Evans Correctional Institution
as 6:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
William Herbert McCladdie
Respondent:
State of SC and Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobo v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 1:2020cv03078
Petitioner:
Allen Bobo
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lynel Witherspoon v. Donnie Stonebreaker
as 19-7276
Petitioner / Appellant:
LYNEL WITHERSPOON
Respondent / Appellee:
DONNIE STONEBREAKER, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Jennings v. Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
as 5:2019cv02355
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of and Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Nuke Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Bragg
as 6:2018cv01349
Petitioner:
Saleem Davis
Defendant:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Derrick Young v. Warden of Evans Correctional
as 18-6296
Petitioner - Appellant:
DERRICK ANTRON YOUNG
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Daniel McNeil, Jr. v. Warden of Evans CI
as 16-6309
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL MCNEIL, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF EVANS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Respondent:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Marcus Antwon Greene v. Willie Eagleton
as 16-6212
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS ANTWON GREENE
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE L. EAGLETON, as the Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Lewis v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2015cv04288
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lewis
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Matthew Harris v. Willie Eagleton
as 13-6359
Petitioner - Appellant:
MATTHEW S. HARRIS
Respondent - Appellee:
MR. WILLIE L. EAGLETON, Warden of Evans Correctional Institution SCDC and SC ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.