Cases 11 - 17 of 17
William Pope, et al. v. A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-84361
Plaintiff:
William Pope
Defendant:
A.c. And S. Inc. (armstrong Cont
POPE et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2009cv84361
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE ANN POPE, CHARLOTTE ANN POPE, WILLIAM POPE and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Langdale et al v. Langdale et al
as 7:2008cv00101
Plaintiff:
Robert Harley Langdale, Robert Harley Langdale, Robert Harley Langdale and others
Defendant:
John W. Langdale, Jr., James W. Phillips and Steve D. Watts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2000cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
BLEDSOE et al v. A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66631
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BLEDSOE, LES A. BRADSHAW, JR., EMIL B. BYERS and others
Defendant:
A.C. AND S. INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Frencel et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv02900
Plaintiff:
Donna Mae Frencel, Donna Mae Frencel, Martin Joseph Frencel and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Andrews, et al v. Clark Sand & Co., et al
as 2:2003cv00293
Plaintiff:
Mervin Andrews, Jr., Charles Fortenberry, Larry Sparkman and others
Defendant:
Clark Sand & Co., Sherwin-Williams Company, Vulcan Materials Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
