Cases 11 - 20 of 66
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56597
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WOLF v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54059
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bland v. The People of the State of California et al
as 3:2020cv00964
Defendant:
Superior Court of California, San Diego County Dist. Atty., The People of the State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis Bland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82769
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WOLFE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parkman v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Defendant:
Chris Simpler and William Wolfe
Plaintiff:
Darryl Parkman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marsden v. Wolfe et al
as 3:2019cv01513
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe unlimited attorney, William Wolfe, Lackawanna County and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alan Marsden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bowles v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2019cv01027
Plaintiff:
John Bowles
Defendant:
William Wolfe, Erick Enderle, City of San Jose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Wolfe v. Johanna Smith
as 17-35757
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM WOLFE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHANNA SMITH
Wolfe v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2017cv06150
Plaintiff:
Brian William Wolfe
Defendant:
The State of New York, The District Attorneys of Dutchess County, Dutchess Country Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fontenot v. Medtronic Inc
as 2:2017cv00695
Plaintiff:
David Fontenot
Defendant:
Medtronic Inc , Erich William Wolf, II, Center for Neurosurgical & Spine Disorders L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
