Cases 11 - 20 of 14,974
WILLIAMS v. CITY OF CARMEL POLICE DEPT. et al
as 1:2024cv01600
Defendant:
JAMES SEMESTER, ESTEBAN NAVARRETTE, GARRETT DURKAC and others
Plaintiff:
SOLOMON WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILLIAMS v. DUGAN
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JESSICA DUGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hesser Automotive, Inc. et al v. Newmar Corporation
as 3:2024cv00608
Plaintiff:
Hesser Automotive, Inc. and William Hesser
Defendant:
Newmar Corporation
Pretrial Service:
Kevin Fitzharris
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Simbeck v. Redman et al
as 3:2024cv00757
Defendant:
William J Redman, Garrett W Fields and Todd H Shephard
Plaintiff:
Rocky Dwight Simbeck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARNER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv01520
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WILLIAM WARNER
Defendant:
WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS, COOK MEDICAL LLC and COOK INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DEFRANZO v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2024cv07115
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Plaintiff:
KIM DEFRANZO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Williams
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Defendant:
Dee Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Williams
as 3:2024cv00749
Defendant:
Dee Williams
Plaintiff:
Jerren Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. GIBSON COUNTY JAIL
as 3:2024cv00125
Defendant:
GIBSON COUNTY JAIL
Plaintiff:
TYSHAWN D. WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2024cv01464
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER, ZIGLER, BREHM and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT RAMON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
