Cases 11 - 20 of 21,968
v. STOCKTON et al
as 2:2024cv00564
Defendant:
RONALD STOCKTON, LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STOCKTON v. HARRY et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
RONALD STOCKTON
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, RANDY IRWIN, DEPUTY M-BLICHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Sebastian Dayton Walker
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
SCULLEN v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCULLEN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, SECRETARY DR. HARRY LAUREL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sollenberger v. Varner et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Alan Sollenberger
Defendant:
D. Varner, Emily Walker, Robert Mariani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDONALD v. MARSH et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
JOHN MAURICE McDONALD
Defendant:
ROBERT MARSH, SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, MAJOR DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT TINA WALKER, MR. MATIYASIC, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWAY v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CONWAY
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT RANDY IRWIN, CO- MOWREY, CO MOWREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Anders et al
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael Walker
Defendant:
N.W. Anders, C. Pittsinger, Ms. Sheffield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
