Cases 11 - 20 of 951
Walker v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Larry O'Neal Walker, II
Defendant:
Chief Cantrell, Keith Gregory, Sgt. Andy Howdeshell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mattison v. Rowland et al
as 1:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Daniel Mattison, Noah Rashad Lyles, Lane Douglas Hills and others
Defendant:
Bucky Rowland, Josh Hyatt and Roger Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Burton et al
as 4:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Cody Allen Rush
Defendant:
Kendra Burton and Jammi Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Walker v. Rutherford County Adult Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv01311
Plaintiff:
Charles Walker
Defendant:
Rutherford County Adult Detention Center and f/n/u Keegan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Walker v. Sanofi US Services Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv01228
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc., Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc.
Plaintiff:
Janie Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Shelby County et al
as 2:2023cv02654
Plaintiff:
Ulycee Moore
Defendant:
Shelby County, Chris Craft, Anthony Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
