Cases 11 - 20 of 36
TAYLOR v. PHILBIN
as 4:2021cv00214
Petitioner:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris et al v. Ward et al
as 1:2021cv00172
Plaintiff:
Wesley Vandale Harris and Mrs. Deborah Jayce King Fulton
Defendant:
Mr. Timothy C. Ward, Mr. Terry E. Barnard, Mr. Stand Shepard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cook v. Gains et al
as 1:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Captain Gaines, Lieutenant Mr. Neal, Sergeant Ms. McAuthor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00256
Plaintiff:
Jeremy John Wells
Defendant:
Commissioner Timothy Ward, Warden Brooks Benton, Z. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pipore v. Philbin
as 1:2021cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mwamaratunga Pipore
Defendant:
Warden Edward Philbin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Philbin
as 1:2021cv00142
Petitioner:
Ladarius Jones
Respondent:
Warden Edward Philbin
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COOK v. PHILBIN
as 3:2021cv00087
Petitioner:
DANIEL DELANE COOK
Respondent:
WARDEN EDWARD PHILBIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAYLOR v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY BOUVIER TAYLOR
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRACEWELL, BRUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prince et al v. Philbin et al
as 1:2021cv00009
Plaintiff:
Freddie Hilton, William E. West, IV, Kawaski Bush and others
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Correction, Tamika Harvey, Warden Edward Philbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells et al v. Philbin et al
as 1:2020cv00134
Plaintiff:
Joshua Westover, Michael Brandon Hill, Jeremy John Wells and others
Defendant:
Warden Edward Philbin, FNU Fluker, FNU Everet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.