Cases 11 - 20 of 12,150
Johnson v. Boose et al
as 1:2024cv00890
Plaintiff:
Raheem Johnson
Defendant:
Boose, CAPTAIN Baptiste, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR Heist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Carrols Corp et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Carrols Corp, Restaurant Brand International Inc., Burger King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2024cv02314
Petitioner:
SOLOMON JOHNSON
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. CENCORA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv02227
Plaintiff:
IVERY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CENCORA, INC. and THE LASH GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
JOHNSON v. BOOSE et al
as 2:2024cv02208
Plaintiff:
RAHEEM JOHNSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOOSE, CAPTAIN BAPTISTE, GRIEVANCE COUNSELOR HEIST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
JOHNSON v. GUTHRIE
as 2:2024cv02170
Plaintiff:
DION M. JOHNSON
Defendant:
CPL GUTHRIE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAMOS et al v. WALMART INC.
as 2:2024mc00026
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE RAMOS and EDWIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
WALMART INC.
Petitioner:
VANESSA TWYMAN
Yasinov v. United States et al
as 2:2024cv01939
Plaintiff:
Igor Yasinov
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BRYANT, DR. JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TUTORA v. FAREED et al
as 2:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
TOLEKSIS BIIN TUTORA, SR.
Defendant:
DR. FAREED and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
