Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Holly v. Lemmon et al
as 3:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Holly
Defendant:
Bruce Lemmon, Michael R Pence, R Williamson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv01410
Defendant:
VICKI BURDINE, KEITH BUTTS, CORIZON, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLLY
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOLLY v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2014cv01337
Defendant:
BOLT, BURDINE, K. BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gege Odion v. Google Inc., et al
as 14-12394
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEGE ODION, individually, and, d.b.a. Siris Property Management, LLC, d.b.a. Optiworld Vision Center
Defendant - Appellee:
GOOGLE INC., JAMES P. BLUM, JR., CYNTHIA D. WRIGHT and others
Defendant:
SERVICE
Holly v. Sevier et al
as 3:2013cv01065
Plaintiff:
William Holly
Defendant:
Mark Sevier, Unknown Property Room Officer, Claire Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holly v. Superintendent
as 3:2013cv00546
Petitioner:
William Holly
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hollis v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23277
Plaintiff:
William Hollis
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holly v. Lemon et al
as 3:2012cv00047
Plaintiff:
William Holly
Defendant:
B Lemmon, M Sevier, J Wynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLLY v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2012cv00081
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HOLLY
Defendant:
B. LEMMON, M. POGUE, M. SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Glover (Marte)
as 11-5467
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Robert Rawls, Charles Bunch, AKA June, Christopher Lamont Sherman, AKA C-L and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Genero Marte, G and Roshaun Hoggard, AKA Foot
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
