Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Strayer et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv07266
Plaintiff:
Marybeth Strayer and William Strayer
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holmes v. Williamson et al
as 3:2011cv03308
Plaintiff:
Larry M Holmes
Defendant:
Neil Williamson, Jim Minor, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Holmes v. Williamson et al
as 3:2011cv03230
Plaintiff:
Larry M Holmes
Defendant:
Neil Williamson , Enos Brents , Terry Durr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Williamson et al
as 3:2011cv03224
Plaintiff:
Franchot B Taylor
Defendant:
Neil Williamson, Terry Durr, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Strayer et al
as 3:2011cv03206
Plaintiff:
Clyde Wallace Bey
Defendant:
William Strayer, . Fox, John Kirby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Smith, Jr. v. Sangamon County Sheriff's Dept, et al
as 11-1979
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY E. SMITH, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SANGAMON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEIL WILLIAMSON, individually as Sheriff of Sangamon County, TERRY DURR, individually as Superintendent of the Sangamon County Detention Facility and others
Foster v. Williamson et al
as 3:2009cv03320
Plaintiff:
Shone Foster
Defendant:
Neil Williamson, Ron Beckner, Terry Durr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clasen v. Williamson et al
as 3:2009cv03319
Plaintiff:
Mark Clasen
Defendant:
Niel Williamson, Terry Durr, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foster v. Williamson et al
as 3:2009cv03097
Plaintiff:
Shone Foster
Defendant:
Neil Williamson, Terry Durr, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brunner v. Sommers et al
as 3:2008cv03155
Plaintiff:
David Daniel Brunner
Defendant:
Amy Sommers, Terry Durr, William Strayer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
