Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Smith et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01386
Plaintiff:
William Smith and Donna Smith
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. ASTRUE
as 1:2011cv01350
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Kobitz et al v. Becker et al
as 2:2011cv00106
Plaintiff:
Chris Kobitz , William Smith and Roger A Peele
Defendant:
Mark Becker and Portage City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Johnson v. Meyerrose et al
as 1:2010cv01197
Defendant:
DET JOHN C, DET WILLIAM MEYERROSE and WILLIAM SMITH
Plaintiff:
JAMES JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Meyerrose et al
as 3:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
James Johnson
Defendant:
Det William Meyerrose, William Smith and Det John C
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Housing Authority of South Bend et al
as 3:2009cv00330
Plaintiff:
William Smith and Lubirta Smith
Defendant:
Housing Authority of South Bend, Marva J Leonard-Dent, Board of Commissioners of HASB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
SMITH v. ANDY MOHR-BUICK, PONTIAC, GMC et al
as 1:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH, JR.
Defendant:
ANDY MOHR-BUICK, PONTIAC, GMC, SHAWN M. RHEA and FISHERS POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. REZXALLA et al
as 1:2008cv00583
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
NADER REZXALLA, LAWRENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT and JUDGE JAMES JOVEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. DONAHUE et al
as 2:2008cv00063
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH
Defendant:
COMM J. DAVID DONAHUE, MICHAEL OSBURN and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
