Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Engel v. Verizon Wireless
as 4:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Credence Resource Management, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00824
Defendant:
Credence Resource Management, LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Plaintiff:
Erin K. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Crockett et al v. Am Net Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00417
Defendant:
Crosslink Wireless, L.L.C. and Am Net Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ivlow-Paquette and Michael Crockett
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lam v. Finn et al
as 1:2019cv00111
Defendant:
Ofc. Greg Palovick, Ofc. Unknown Allen, Stephan Lawhorn and others
Plaintiff:
James Lam, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Webster Groves, MO v. CCATT LLC et al
as 4:2018cv01910
Defendant:
CCATT LLC, Crown Castle International Corp. and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Plaintiff:
City of Webster Groves, Missouri and City of Webster Groves, MO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company v. Wireless Horizon, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01773
Defendant:
Mark W. Garner, Wireless Horizon, Inc., Troy J. Heisler and others
Plaintiff:
Navigators Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00952
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daugherty v. Safelink Wireless et al
as 6:2018cv03078
Plaintiff:
Ricky Jerome Daugherty
Defendant:
Safelink Wireless, Trackfone Wireless and Suzanne Clarke-Milton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
