Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Larson v. Beshear et al
as 3:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
James H. Larson
Defendant:
Steven L. Beshear, Rodney Brewer, Timothy Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larson v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. et al
as 3:2010cv00341
Plaintiff:
Brian Robert Larson
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, USA , Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America , Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd. and others
Riches v. Field & Stream Magazine et al
as 1:2009cv00047
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Field & Stream Magazine, Jonas Bonnier, Tony Snow and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Larson v. United States of America
as 5:2009cv00074
Plaintiff:
James H. Larson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Larson Themed Construction, Inc. et al v. The Hettema Group et al
as 2:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Larson Themed Construction, Inc. and Bill Shehan, Jr.
Defendant:
The Hettema Group and Phil Hettema
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Larson v. Hardin County Detention Center
as 3:2007cv00611
Petitioner:
James H. Larson
Respondent:
Hardin County Detition Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gross v. Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Elmer Gross, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Director of the Bureau of Prisons, Louis Milusmic, Unknown Designating Team and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McGowan v. H.E. Larson, LLC
as 5:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Melissa McGowan
Defendant:
H.E. Larson, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Larson v. Two Women Commonwealth Attorneys et al
as 3:2007cv00610
Plaintiff:
James H. Larson
Defendant:
Two Women Commonwealth Attorneys and Detective Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
