Cases 11 - 20 of 52
Levis v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
as 8:2019cv02183
Plaintiff:
Mark Levis
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weil v. Mark D. Levy Horticultural Services, LLC et al
as 7:2019cv04493
Defendant:
Mark Levy, Jr., Mark Levy,Sr. and Mark D. Levy Horticultural Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Matthew Weil
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marin v. P.H.A.J. Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv01675
Plaintiff:
Rafael Marin
Defendant:
Jordan Garfinkel and P.H.A.J. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Levy et al v. DePuy Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00302
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Sharon A Levy and Mark Levy
Special Master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEVY et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv02040
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
MARK LEVY and NICOLE LEVY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CASSELL v. LEVY et al
as 2:2017cv05508
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL CASSELL
Defendant:
MARK LEVY , U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION , KML LAW GROUP, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEVY v. SANCHEZ
as 2:2017cv04329
Plaintiff:
MARK LEVY
Defendant:
KAREN SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv02134
Plaintiff:
Mark Levy
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
FRIEDLER v. GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2015cv02267
Plaintiff:
ARIEL MANUEL FRIEDLER
Defendant:
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION , MARIA SWABY and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
