Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 231 - 240 of 140,644
Bray v. Ray
as 5:2024cv00036
Petitioner: Reginald Bray
Respondent: H. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beane v. Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: James Beane
Defendant: Allegheny Wood Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Wilson v. Searls et al
as 1:2024cv00110
Plaintiff: Benjamin Lee Wilson
Defendant: Shelby Searls, Tristin Tenney and Angel Cole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC v. McFadden et al
as 5:2024cv00058
Plaintiff: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant: William McFadden and Yvonne McFadden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lewis v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00039
Petitioner: Vashun Lewis
Respondent: S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baker v. Lovett
as 3:2024cv00038
Petitioner: Samuel Baker
Respondent: Warden Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chapman v. Mnuchin
as 1:2024cv00179
Petitioner: Josh Chapman
Respondent: Steven Mnuchin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Eastwood v. Mingo County Commission et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Andrew Jackson Eastwood, Jr.
Defendant: Mingo County Commission, Mingo County Sheriff Joe Smith, Deputy J. D. Tincher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Damron v. F.C.I Hazelton's Warden
as 3:2024cv00016
Petitioner: Jon Damron
Respondent: F.C.I Hazelton's Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?