Cases 21 - 30 of 823
DURHAM v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
as 2:2024cv00639
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DURHAM
Defendant:
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS LLC
Interested Party:
KENNETH HASSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
WISOR v. REESE et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
II MICHAEL ALLEN WISOR
Defendant:
GREGORY T. REESE, JESSICA C. SCHWARTZ and ALTOONA PAROLE OFFICE UNIT 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Randolph v. Keith et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Petitioner:
Shawn Luke Randolph
Respondent:
Jessica Keith and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bryson v. Kremar
as 3:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Maria Michelle Bryson
Defendant:
Jessica Kremar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUNCAN-GEIGER v. IRON HILL BREWERY, LLC
as 2:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
JESSICA DEE DUNCAN-GEIGER
Defendant:
IRON HILL BREWERY, LLC doing business as IRON HILL BREWERY & RESTAURANT
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KIRBY v. UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
JESSICA KIRBY
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER, DONALD YEALY, AMBER FLECK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Diaz v. Sage
as 1:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Pedro Diaz
Respondent:
Warden Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Hamad v. Sage
as 3:2024cv00130
Petitioner:
Wael Hamad
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Sage
as 3:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Dwight Williams
Respondent:
Jessica Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
