Cases 21 - 30 of 15,672
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Fantel, Jr. v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island and Town of South Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Blandino v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Chaquiro Blandino
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Captain Macumber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hennessy v. Hennessy et al
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Patrice Hennessy
Defendant:
Jayme Hennessy, Megan Hennessy and Alexus Dupont
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jones v. The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00219
Plaintiff:
Kelin Jones
Defendant:
The Cheesecake Factory Restaurants, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Magga v. Citizens Bank, N.A.
as 1:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jamie Magga
Defendant:
Citizens Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Cano v. Salisbury
as 1:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Julio Cano
Respondent:
Wayne Salisbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DeBritto v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Timothy DeBritto
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections and Rachel Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
