Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Porter v. Belk et al
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Antowin Vashia Porter
Defendant:
Jeffery Belk, James R. Cooper, Anthony L. Smith and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramsey v. Crosby et al
as 1:2022cv00024
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Ramsey
Defendant:
Michael Crosby, Christopher Holt and David Sullivan
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake and Eric *DO NOT FILE* Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC., Best Buy Co., Inc., Corie Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brock v. Wright et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Plaintiff:
Callie Brock
Defendant:
Jeffery Wright and Kristie Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramsey v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2021cv00270
Plaintiff:
Jeffery E. Ramsey, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Guidry v. Memorial Hospital at Gulfport et al
as 1:2021cv00235
Plaintiff:
Adam Guidry
Defendant:
Memorial Hospital at Gulfport doing business as Memorial Hospital at Stone County, Jeffery Sloan and John Doe Entities 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00040
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00060
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ruffin v. Porter et al
as 3:2020cv00335
Defendant:
Warden J.J. Williams, D. Warden B. Tyler, Sgt. L. Pigeon and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery D. Ruffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
