Cases 21 - 30 of 277
Rodriguez v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03923
Plaintiff:
Estella Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cross-Blancke v. Flaiz et al
as 1:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Deborah Cross-Blancke
Defendant:
James R. Flaiz, Natalie E. Ray and Oscar E. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terwilliger et al v. Intellihartx, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01509
Plaintiff:
Robert Joseph Terwilliger and Edwin Rodriguez
Defendant:
Intellihartx, LLC and Fortra LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Boykin et al v. The Procter & Gamble Company
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
Rah-Nita Boykin, Jennifer Harmon and Elizabeth Rodriguez
Defendant:
The Procter & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01305
Plaintiff:
Elsa Maria Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rodriguez-Robles v. Warden, FCI Elkton
as 4:2023cv01285
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez-Robles
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Elkton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cromartie v. Hale et al
as 2:2023cv01802
Plaintiff:
Alton Cromartie
Defendant:
Dr. Arthur Hale, Mary Roush, Ashley Orsbone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Varela Rivera et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv01520
Plaintiff:
Carmen R. Varela Rivera and Angel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palmer v. Gradilla
as 1:2023cv00235
Petitioner:
Marcelino Segura Palmer
Respondent:
Gabriela Rodriguez Gradilla
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
