Cases 21 - 30 of 157
Hamrick et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Michelle Hamrick and Hayley Harrison
Defendant:
Rutherford County, John K Carroll, Kimber Dover-Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Best et al v. Stanley et al
as 4:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Frederick Best, Ms. Carolyn Shaw, Joseph Carroll and others
Defendant:
Barry Stanley, C Page, Unknown Members Ayden Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Suleta et al v. Citibank, N.A. et al
as 5:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Alejandro J. Suleta and Adrianne Carroll
Defendant:
Citibank, N.A. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Carroll v. Kijakazi
as 5:2021cv00483
Plaintiff:
Amanda Carroll
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
WALL v. USA
as 1:2021cv00572
Petitioner:
JOHN CARROLL WALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Clemmons Farming, Inc. et al v. Silveus Southeast LLC et al
as 7:2021cv00126
Plaintiff:
Clemmons Farming, Inc., Jody E. Clemmons and Lauren B. Clemmons
Defendant:
Silveus Southeast LLC and James M. Carroll, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00322
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
WARREN v. CARROLL et al
as 1:2021cv00415
Defendant:
R.E. CAROLL MANAGEMENT, HAYLEIGH WILLIAGE APTS, RENTGROW and others
Plaintiff:
TINIKA S. WARREN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
