Cases 21 - 30 of 168
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Bragg v. Wertz et al
as 1:2022cv01041
Plaintiff:
Chavonte A Bragg
Defendant:
Dennis Wertz and Josh Keim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gary Keim v. Kevin Mazza, et al
as 22-5064
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY KEIM
Defendant / Appellee:
KEVIN MAZZA, Warden, BOBBI JO BUTTS, Warden and LESSYE CRAFTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv08308
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Abuharba v Claycomb et al
as 3:2021cv01077
Plaintiff:
Monammed Abuharba
Defendant:
Chaplain Claycomb, Chief Keim, Lance Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keim v. Kijakazi
as 2:2021cv00322
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Not Classified By Court:
SSA Notice
Plaintiff:
David Keim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Jeffrey E. Brandlin v. M. Burr Keim Company
as 8:2021cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Brandlin
Defendant:
M. BURR KEIM COMPANY, dba LUXURY BAZAAR, a Pennsylvania corporation and M. Burr Keim Company a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Luxury Bazaar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Jeffrey E. Brandlin v. M. Burr Keim Company
as 2:2021cv00676
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey E Brandlin
Defendant:
M. Burr Keim Company a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Luxury Bazaar and Luxage Group Inc a Pennsylvania corporation doing business as Luxury Bazaar
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Babnik v. Village of Antioch et al
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
Robert Long, Larry Hanson, Tom Nowotarski and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Babnik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
