Cases 21 - 30 of 308
Shustek v. Mobile Infrastructure Corporation
as 1:2023cv00599
Defendant:
Mobile Infrastructure Corporation and The Parking Reit, Inc. and MVP Reit II, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael V Shustek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Emrit v. British Secret Service et al
as 1:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
British Secret Service, Central Authority of England, Hague Conference on Private Litigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Park Plus, Inc. v. Lexington Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Park Plus, Inc.
Defendant:
Lexington Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Rent Lease & Ejectment
Parks v. Bruens et al
as 1:2022cv03269
Plaintiff:
Arnilo Parks
Defendant:
Warden Carlos Bruens and Warden Todd Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moment v. Rahimi et al
as 8:2022cv03199
Plaintiff:
Michael Moment
Defendant:
Ahmed Rahimi, Evans Fomunyoh, City/Town of Takoma Park and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1451 Immigration: Revocation of Citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Park v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2022cv02393
Plaintiff:
Heeyoung Park
Defendant:
Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Greg Collett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
