Cases 21 - 30 of 406
Glass v. Tipton Co. Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 2:2022cv02661
Plaintiff:
Alissa Glass
Defendant:
Tipton Co. Sheriff's Dept., J.T. Chumley, Tim Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roemer v. Hurd et al
as 3:2022cv00676
Plaintiff:
Neil B. Roemer
Defendant:
Stacy Hurd, Tim Dutton, Tim Dutton doing business as Tim Dutton Group, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Robinson v. Dickson County Jail et al
as 3:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
Randall Seth Robinson
Defendant:
Dickson County Jail, Tim Eads, (f/n/u) Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Bank of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00524
Plaintiff:
Tamika McDonald
Defendant:
Bank of Tennessee, Brian Bishop, Tim Man and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Hughes v. Duncan et al
as 3:2022cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Hughes
Defendant:
Zane Duncan, Gary M. Faulcon, Tim Gobble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hart v. Chester County Tennessee et al
as 1:2021cv01212
Defendant:
Kyle Carter, Chester County Tennessee, Chester County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Lynn Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
March v. TDOC et al
as 3:2021cv00411
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Octaivian March and Octaivian Demetrius Reeves
Defendant:
TDOC, Sgt Tim Carrell, H. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mudd v. Loudon County et al
as 3:2021cv00402
Plaintiff:
William Mudd
Defendant:
Loudon County, Jake Keener, Deputy Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarten v. Bradshaw et al
as 3:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Avery Sarten
Defendant:
Buddy Bradshaw, Henry J Cullen, Julia C Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweatt v. Hininger et al
as 1:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
Antonio L. Sweatt
Defendant:
Damon Hininger, Warden Grady Perry, f/n/u Patton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
