Cases 21 - 30 of 35
QUICK et al v. CITY OF BEECH GROVE
as 1:2016cv01709
Defendant:
CITY OF BEECH GROVE
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH MAYS-MILLER and KYMBERLY QUICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA et al v. UNITED CHURCH RESIDENCES OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00339
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN BROCK, FAIR HOUSING CENTER OF CENTRAL INDIANA, INC., PATRICIA LIGHT and others
Defendant:
SHEA HODOWANIEC, UNITED CHURCH HOMES, INC. and UNITED CHURCH RESIDENCES OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
POFF v. QUICK PICK, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00405
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY M. POFF
Defendant:
QUICK PICK, LLC and AHMED SHAKER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02051
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act
Campbell v. Stoveken et al
as 2:2014cv00048
Plaintiff:
Mark Campbell
Defendant:
John Stoveken and Quick Transport LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaulden v. Fries et al
as 1:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Trent Gaulden
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Aaron Quick, Vance Pruden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Kegley v. Ray et al
as 1:2011cv00386
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kegley
Defendant:
Chad Ray, Aaron Quick, Craig Knox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Fries et al
as 1:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Travis E Smith
Defendant:
Ken Fries, Aaron Quick, Officer Pullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
