Cases filed in Maine
Cases 21 - 30 of 289
NOBREGA v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2023cv00182
Plaintiff: DOMINGUS NOBREGA
Defendant: YORK COUNTY and WILLIAM KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB v. COCHRAN
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY FSB
Defendant: WILLIAM N COCHRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
ROUSSEL v. MAYO et al
as 1:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: JOSEPH F ROUSSEL
Defendant: WILLIAM MAYO and ROBERT YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP v. WILLIAMS
as 1:2023cv00013
Plaintiff: JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP
Defendant: ANTHONY SCOTT WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SCHUSTER v. WILLIAMS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00359
Plaintiff: JOHN SCHUSTER
Defendant: DANNY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WICKHAM v. UNITED STATES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff: WILLIAM J WICKHAM
Defendant: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FULLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv00331
ROUSSEL v. MAYO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00285
Plaintiff: JOSEPH F ROUSSEL
Defendant: WILLIAM MAYO, SCOTT WILCOX, RYAN BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DICKEY
as 1:2022cv00254
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: WILLIAM C DICKEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
MORGAN v. CMG MORTGAGE INC
as 2:2022cv00232
Plaintiff: WILLIAM MORGAN doing business as CMG FINANCIAL and WILLIAM MORGAN
Defendant: CMG MORTGAGE INC and CMG MORTGAGE INC doing business as CMG FINANCIAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?