Cases 21 - 30 of 299
Bryant v. Argon Medical Devices, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Carson Bryant
Defendant:
Argon Medical Devices, Inc., Rex Medical, Inc. doing business as Rex Medical, L.P., Rex Medical, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01452
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bandy-Freeman v. City of Tarrant, Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv01148
Plaintiff:
Veronica Bandy-Freeman
Defendant:
City of Tarrant, Alabama, Wayman A Newton and John Tommy Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mathews v. Johnson
as 7:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Quiana Mathews
Defendant:
Kermit Johnson, H. Bryant and Mr. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00473
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Birmingham, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2022cv00982
Plaintiff:
Michael Bryant
Defendant:
Birmingham, Alabama, City of, Dontrell McCray, Birmingham Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flagg v. Jones et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Andrea Duhreal Flagg and Andre D. Flagg-El
Defendant:
W.G. Jones, James Watson, Randall Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
