Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Moofly Productions, LLC v. Sandra Favila et al
as 2:2013cv05866
Defendant:
Does, Estate of Richard C. Corrales and Sandra Favila
Counter Claimant:
Estate of Richard Charles Corrales, Estate of Richard Charles Corrales and Motion Graphix, Inc.
Counter Defendant:
Get Flipped, Inc., Get Flipped, Inc., Thomas Joel and others
Plaintiff:
Moofly Productions, LLC
Saldana v. Favila et al
as 3:2012cv02795
Plaintiff:
Jaime G. Saldana
Defendant:
Cesar R. Favila, B. Beltran, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dennis Grimes v. James Tilton, et al
as 11-56738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DENNIS GRIMES
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES E. TILTON, A. FAVILA, S. JUAREZ and others
Dennis Grimes v. James Tilton, et al
as 11-56738
Defendant / Appellant:
V. ALMAGER, A. FAVILA, A. HERNANDEZ and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DENNIS GRIMES
Villa v. Cate et al
as 1:2011cv00876
Plaintiff:
Robert Villa
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, W.J. Sullivan, Mike Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Escalante et al
as 3:2010cv02387
Plaintiff:
Damon Martin
Defendant:
M Escalante, E Benyard, A Favila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Favila v. TDCJ
as 4:2010cv00840
Plaintiff:
Moses Favila
Defendant:
TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FAVILA-HERRERA v. USA
as 2:2010cv00059
Petitioner:
RAMON FAVILA-HERRERA
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Favila et al v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
Samantha Rodriguez Favila
Defendant:
Physicians Network Association, Reeves County and The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Burnett v. Trujillo
as 3:2010cv00764
Plaintiff:
Ester Burnett
Defendant:
M Trujillo, F Perdomo, G N Granish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
