Cases 21 - 30 of 54
Hurst v. Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan (TV3)
as 3:2014cv00507
Plaintiff:
Charles Dale Hurst
Defendant:
Akzo Nobel Retirement Account Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Mayers v. Boyd et al
as 3:2014cv01560
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Mayers
Defendant:
Joey Boyd, Ronnie Williams, Bob Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hurst v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 3:2014cv00341
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Hurst
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of and SSA Office of General Counsel - 2014
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor et al v. Harlan et al
as 3:2014cv01363
Plaintiff:
Arianna Taylor, Eric Taylor and Gail Taylor
Defendant:
Charles W. Harlan, Michelle Elgin, Robert (Bob) Elgin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Hurst
as 3:2014cv00072
Plaintiff:
Lavonte Dominique Simmons
Defendant:
J Hurst
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pierce et al v. Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00641
Plaintiff:
Jesse Pierce , Michael Pierce , Benjamin Blount and others
Defendant:
Wyndham Vacation Resorts, Inc. and Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Hurst v. Tennessee Dept. of Correction et al
as 1:2013cv01103
Plaintiff:
Charles Hurst
Defendant:
Tennessee Dept. of Correction, Tracy Howell, Cosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurst v. Rowland
as 3:2012cv00598
Plaintiff:
Jane A Hurst
Defendant:
David Wayne Rowland and Barbara Sue Rowland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00340
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
