Cases 21 - 30 of 81
2008 Rover Walck Saloon, LLC et al v. Beard
as 3:2015cv02095
Plaintiff:
2008 Rover Walck Saloon, LLC and Michael J. Johnson
Defendant:
William D. Beard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2015cv02343
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21 and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES DISTRICT COUNCIL 21-LOCAL 2011
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
JOHNSON v. ETHICON, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02254
Plaintiff:
ANITA J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
ETHICON, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. DeRose et al
as 3:2014cv01743
Plaintiff:
Andre J Johnson
Defendant:
Dominick DeRose, Deputy Warden Nichols and Leonard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WOODS v. COHEN et al
as 2:2014cv02888
Plaintiff:
TETE WOODS
Defendant:
JEREMY COHEN, KRYSTLE J. JOHNSON and NICHOLAS BOOKBINDER
Cross_claimant:
NICHOLAS BOOKBINDER
Cross_defendant:
JEREMY COHEN and KRYSTLE J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BENOFF v. JOHNSON
as 2:2013cv01537
Plaintiff:
JACK BENOFF
Defendant:
EDWARD J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AARON et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05819
Plaintiff:
VICKIE AARON , HELEN ADAMS , CAROLYN ANDERSON and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEE v. CHRISTOPHER et al
as 1:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
DION PATRICK LEE, III
Defendant:
W. CHRISTOPHER and J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROUSE v. II-VI INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
AMBROSIO ROUSE
Defendant:
II-VI INCORPORATED, BRUCE GLICK, CSABA SZELES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
JOHNSON v. HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
as 2:2012cv00612
Plaintiff:
MARY J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
HIGHMARK BLUE SHIELD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
