Cases 21 - 29 of 29
DO NOT DOCKET IN 2:11CV386. DOCUMENTS SHOULD BE FILED IN 2:10CR1217
as 2:2011cv00386
Petitioner:
Rolando Levya-Torres
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jesus Levya v. Medlin Industries Inc, et al
as 11-80217
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
JESUS LEVYA, on behalf of himself and all other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Respondent:
MEDLIN INDUSTRIES INC, a California corporation and DOES 1 THROUGH 50, INCLUSIVE
USA v. Jose Leyva-Martinez
as 10-50269
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO LEYVA-MARTINEZ, AKA Jose Antonio Levya-Hernandez
Miguel Hernandez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 10-71257
Petitioner:
MIGUEL ANGEL HERNANDEZ, AKA Miguel Angel Hernandez-Rangel, AKA Daniel Levya, II
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Co v. Buswell et al
as 6:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
Endurance American Specialty Insurance Co
Defendant:
Richard Buswell, Stephen Fouke, Bowman Investment Group L L C and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
United States v. Irazoqui-Leyva
as 09-4196
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARIA GUADALUPE IRAZOQUI-LEYVA, AKA Maria Guadalupe Levya, AKA Maria Leyva, AKA Maria Guadalupe Irazoqui-De La Rosa, AKA Maria Irazoqui-Layva
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01833
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at00906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levya et al v. J & H Granite, Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00683
Plaintiff:
Angel Levya, Ernesto Leyva, Carolos Valenzuela and others
Defendant:
J & H Granite, Inc. and John Ivey
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
