Cases 21 - 30 of 1,823
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Henry v. Semple
as 3:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Brandon M. Henry and Brandon Henry
Defendant:
Commissioner of Corrections and Scott Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Fagan v. Mcllquham
as 3:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Isobel M. Fagan
Defendant:
Craig Mcllquham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Yeboah et al v. U.S. Bank, National Association et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Cheryl L. Yeboah and Kwadwo A. Yeboah
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, National Association, State of Connecticut, Robert Vacchelli and others
Wood et al v. Foster et al
as 3:2024cv00289
Plaintiff:
David M. Wood and Association of Bridal Consultants, Inc.
Defendant:
Veronica M. Foster and International Association of Wedding Planners, LLC doing business as Association of Bridal Consultants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Randolph v. Marcucci
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Randolph
Defendant:
Marcucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mims v. Laprey
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Tijun M Mims
Defendant:
Laprey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M&T Capital and Leasing Corp. v. K2 Leasing LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
M&T Capital and Leasing Corp. and People
Defendant:
K2 Leasing LLC, Tesla Trans Inc., Hippo Logistics Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
