Cases 21 - 30 of 51
ECP Commercial I LLC v. Bloomington Shopping Center LLC, et al. et al
as 2:2015cv02247
Plaintiff:
ECP Commercial I LLC
Defendant:
Bloomington Shopping Center LLC, et al., Boutte Shopping Center LLC, Cedartown LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02985
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pilkins v. Hawkins County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lynn Pilkins
Defendant:
Butch Gallion, Sharon Smith, Hunter Newton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00361
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00502
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Mello v. Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton et al
as 3:2012cv00404
Plaintiff:
Ralph W. Mello
Defendant:
Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton and Larry Crain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. Newton
as 4:2012cv00025
Plaintiff:
Crystal Turner
Defendant:
Lloyd Newton, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00128
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Newton v. Lawson et al
as 2:2011cv03037
Plaintiff:
William Thomas Newton
Defendant:
G. Lawson , Larry Godwin, Tony Armstrong and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Reames v. Casagrande et al
as 2:2011cv02949
Plaintiff:
Orlando Reames
Defendant:
Casagrande, Baldridge, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
