Cases 21 - 30 of 588
Nishon et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv11972
Plaintiff:
Todd Nishon, James Capps, Joseph Vaillancourt and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Duby v. Barkley et al
as 4:2023cv11864
Plaintiff:
Ariane Jeanine Duby
Defendant:
Todd Vernon Barkley, Hillsdale, County of, Scott B Hodshire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett #630082 v. Schiebner
as 1:2023cv00713
Petitioner:
David Todd Bennett #630082, Sr.
Respondent:
James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kalincheva v. Neubarth et al
as 5:2023mc51021
Plaintiff:
Magdalina Kalincheva
Defendant:
Jesse L. Neubarth and Jeffrey L. Neubarth
3Rd Party Defendant:
FNU Valentyna, FNU Lesovitskaya, FNU Liza and others
Kalincheva v. Neubarth et al
as 5:2023cv11367
Plaintiff:
Magdalina Kalincheva and Magdalina Georgieva Kalincheva [E-filer]
Defendant:
Jesse L. Neubarth and Jeffrey L. Neubarth
3Rd Party Defendant:
FNU Valentyna, FNU Lesovitskaya, FNU Liza and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Voelkert #467972 v. Burgess
as 1:2023cv00495
Petitioner:
David Eugene Voelkert #467972
Respondent:
Michael Burgess and Todd Rokita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Buchanan v. Wuis et al
as 1:2023cv00494
Plaintiff:
Abdul Buchanan
Defendant:
Todd Wuis and Grand Rapids, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Galkin vs Waldroup
as 2:2023cv10901
Plaintiff:
ivan galkin
Defendant:
Todd Waldroup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
People of the State of Michigan, et al v. Lamie
as 1:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Michigan, Heidi Cannon and Todd M. Morgan
Defendant:
RESTRICTED FILER Ervin Joseph Lamie, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 Petition for Removal- Criminal Case Re: Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
